Driveline Mechanics: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Pitch F/X Profile: Jon Lester


Jon Lester

#31 / Pitcher / Boston Red Sox

6-2

190

L

L

Jan 07, 1984



A World Series-clinching win. A successful battle against non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A no-hitter. Red Sox southpaw Jon Lester has already compiled a career's worth of accomplishments, and he's only going on 25.

Star-divide

A second-round selection out of Tacoma, Washington in the 2002 amateur draft, Lester quickly established himself as one of the most promising arms in Boston's farm system. After a solid full-season debut as a 19 year-old at Low-A Augusta in 2003, (106 IP, 6 K/9, 3.7 BB/9), the sturdy lefty punched out over a batter per inning in the High-A Florida State League in 2004 and the AA Eastern League in 2005. His control needed refinement (as evidenced by his 4.8 BB/9 at AAA Pawtucket in 2006), but he made his Fenway debut in the summer of '06 and appeared poised to infuse the Red Sox rotation with a home-grown ace to complement trade acquisition Josh Beckett.

Something far more serious took precedent, however, as Lester was diagnosed with a rare form of a blood cancer in September of that season. While he would spend the better part of the 2007 campaign regaining strength, Lester tossed 63 innings for the Sox and capped off the year on the highest of notes, pitching 5 and 2/3 scoreless innings in the series-winning game against the Colorado Rockies.


W-LGGSCGSHOSVBSIPHRERHRBBKERAWHIP
2008 - Jon Lester 16-6 33 33 2 2 0 0 210.1 202 78 75 14 66 152 3.21 1.27



While his 2008 season got off to a rocky start (22/23 K/BB in April), Lester quickly righted the ship, culminating with a nine-strikeout, no-hit masterpiece against the Kansas City Royals on May 19th. Despite having pitched just 163 combined innings in 2007, Lester appeared to get stronger as the year progressed: from June onward, he posted a 103/30 K/BB ratio in 134.1 innings. So, Lester seems like he's making good on the lofty expectations bestowed upon him prior to his health problems. But how is he doing it? To find that out, let's take a look at Lester's Pitch F/X data.

Lesterpitchfx_medium

The chart above shows the vertical and horizontal movement (in inches) that Lester got on his pitches in 2008, relative to a pitch thrown without spin. The X axis shows the amount of horizontal movement on Lester's pitches, while the Y axis shows the amount of vertical movement on the pitches. The chart is from the view of the catcher, so pitches with a negative horizontal (X axis) value are tailing in on a right-handed hitter. Pitches with a low vertical (Y axis) value are moving down in the strike zone; the lower the Y value, the more downward movement the pitch has.

The 6-2, 190 pounder appears to possess a five-pitch mix: a fastball, cutter, curveball, changeup and slider.

However, it's inaccurate to call Lester a five-pitch hurler. Lester's heater, thrown at an average of 92.1 MPH, has a very wide range both in terms of horizontal and vertical movement. With 6.03 inches of tailing action in on lefties and 7.77 inches of vertical movement, Lester's fastball has the velocity of a four-seam fastball and the motion in on the hands of lefties that one might expect from a two-seamer.

Initially, this pattern confused me. But after doing a little research, I found out that what we're seeing on Lester's chart is actually the combination of a four-seam and one-seam fastball. That's right, one-seam. Lester throws an offshoot of a sinker, gripped in an unusual manner along just one seam of the baseball. While the Pitch F/X data did not discern between the two pitches in terms of classification, the chart shows two distinct clusters, with the four-seamers in the upper right hand of the graph and the one-seamers below them and showing more horizontal movement. Lester's use of the one-seamer may also explain a pretty big uptick in his groundball percentage. Lester induced a worm-burner 47.5% of the time in 2008, up from 40.6% in 2006 and 34.4% in 2007.

For the sake of accuracy, I decided to slice Lester's fastballs into two categories, using a cutoff of 5 inches of vertical movement to differentiate between the four-seamers and one-seamers (the average sinker has about 4.7 inches of vertical movement). It's admittedly arbitrary, but it's a way to better define Lester's two fastballs. Here's an updated, more comprehensive chart of Lester's pitches:

  Lesterupdated_medium

 That's more like it. Now, we can see the difference between Lester's four-seamer and one-seamer.

Now that we have separated the fastballs, they look more like they should in terms of speed and movement. A four-seam fastball is thrown with the most direct application of force, meaning that backspin is imparted on the baseball. Consequently, four-seamers are thrown at a higher velocity, with more vertical movement and less horizontal break. This is the pitch that is sometimes called a "rising" fastball. While that's impossible and would defy the laws of gravity, the four-seamer "drops" less in relation to other pitches, giving it the illusion of rise.  Lester's four-seamer was thrown at an average of 92.3 MPH, with 5.51 inches of tailing action in on lefties and 8.73 inches of vertical movement. He utilized the pitch 47.3% of the time, more often to southpaws than right-handers.

In contrast, the two-seamer (one-seamer in Lester's case) displays more side-to-side action, with sinking movement coming at the expense of some speed. Lester broke out his one-seamer 11% of the time in 2008. The 91.1 MPH hybrid sinker had 3.62 inches of vertical movement and generated plenty of running action in on the hands of southpaws (8.25 inches), higher than the 7.6 major league average.

Lester used his two fastballs a fair amount against right-handed batters (a combined 53.9% of the time), but he really delivered the heat versus fellow southpaws (72.4%). With the ability to change eye levels with his fastballs, Lester eviscerated lefties this past season. Left-handers turned into Tony Pena Jr. versus Jon, batting a feeble .217/.269/.302.

While classified as a curveball, Lester's 76.1 MPH breaker is a sweeping, slurvy pitch. Lester's curve broke away from lefties (in to righties) an average of -5.12  inches (remember, a negative horizontal number means the pitch is breaking in toward a righty), while also dropping -5.14 inches in the zone more than a pitch thrown without spin would. With nearly two more inches of "drop" than the average curve (-3.3) and a big speed differential in comparison to his fastballs, Lester's slurvy offering has the look of a dynamite pitch. He wasn't shy about breaking out the curve against hitters of either hand: lefties saw the pitch 15% of the time, with righties getting the hook on 16.8% of their total pitches.

If a guy with six different pitches can be said to have a bread-and-butter offering, then Lester's cutter fits that description. Thrown 20% of the time overall, the 88.6 MPH pitch bored in on the hands of righties (-1.1 inches). Right-handers saw the pitch about twice as often (22.8%) as southpaws (11.5%).

Let's put that into perspective for a moment. The pitcher's mound is 60 feet, 6 inches from home plate. Adjusting for the stride of the pitcher and the hitter having to make contact with the ball a little out in front, the distance between pitcher and hitter is roughly 53.5 feet. From that distance, Lester's 92.3 MPH four-seam fastball will arrive in .39520 seconds. His cutter will arrive in .41171 seconds. A right-handed batter has .0165 additional seconds to decipher whether a four-seam fastball is going to tail away from him or a cutter is going to jam him inside; the difference in horizontal movement between the pitches is 6.61 inches, well over half a foot. Ted Williams was fond of saying that hitting a baseball is the toughest feat in sports. It's pretty difficult to argue with The Greatest Hitter Who Ever Lived on that one.

Lester also tosses in an occasional changeup and slider, though neither offering figures prominently into his pitch selection. He tossed in an 83.4 MPH change just 3.7% of the time. The changeup sort of takes the middle ground between his four-seamer and one-seamer, tailing 8.46 inches away from righties and possessing 7.05 inches of vertical movement. The slider was incorporated even more rarely, on just 1.3% of Lester's total pitches. His slider seems like a pitch that could mess up the hitter's timing: thrown at an average speed of 83.1 MPH, the slider features -3.9 inches of horizontal movement and 0.24 inches of vertical break. In comparison to his curve, Lester's slide piece is thrown about 7 MPH faster, with less sweeping action and vertical drop. A batter looking for Lester's big curve could end up surprised by the slider.

Suffice it to say, Jon Lester is well-equipped to remain one of the better starters in the American League. With two different fastballs, a devastating cutter and a sweeping curve, Lester can locate his pitches to all four quadrants of the strike zone. If there is a concern with Jon, it's that his workload increased by a whopping 74 innings between 2007 and 2008. The consequences of that increase remain to be seen. But, if Lester remains healthy, don't be surprised if makes a serious run at the Cy Young Award in 2009.

A Journalism student at Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Driveline Mechanics, Fan Graphs and Inside Edge Scouting Services. Contact David via email at golebie1029@duq.edu or judidave87@msn.com

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

One-seam fastball sinker...

I would like to add that Lester’s one-seam fastball sinker is very similar to Dr. Marshall’s Maxline Fastball Sinker grip.

Otherwise, great article!

Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting

by Kyle Boddy on Dec 23, 2008 6:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This would be a lot better if you established what

an average LHP starter’s fastball looks like, where and when he throws it, how well he controls it, what impact throwing it harder has on controlling it, how well a batter hits it, etc. etc. How do the minute changes in movement and velocity affect how the batter is able to hit it. The whole point of DIPS is the idea that the batter is the primary determining factor in how well the ball is hit (i,e. how likely it is to turn into a base hit), so it seems pretty worthwhile, for example, to know what affect an inch of vertical movement would have on k rate or ISO.

As a reader, I had a ton of trouble figuring out the connection between the abstract numbers/plots provided and the subsequent events (BB, HR, 1B, und so weiter) that provide the basis for concrete results-based analysis.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 23, 2008 8:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

*effect

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 23, 2008 8:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know if this is what you are looking for, but here’s a Hardball Times article about the effectiveness of difference types of curveballs and their locations.

by VictorW on Dec 24, 2008 7:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

read it.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 24, 2008 10:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Additionally, I'd think that pitch recognition

for a batter is probably far more related to spin than speed given the very small amount of time available to him. If time were a significant factor in pitch recognition, wouldn’t the change up be a far less effective pitch?

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 23, 2008 8:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It’s both, but for different reasons. For some pitch combination, less speed difference is more deceptive. Fastball/slider is one I remember reading about and so I’m guessing fastball/cutter is in the same category. Basically, if the pitcher paints the edge of the strike zone the batter has very little time to decide if it’s going to stay in for a strike or break off the table. The greater speed helps hide the slider/cutter. For the changeup, you’re right that the spin is important so it looks like a fastball and then a good speed difference puts the batter way ahead of the pitch.

by VictorW on Dec 24, 2008 7:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Trying to get my point across, one more time...for some reason. Blah.

I’m not trying to be a dick. This is just kind of me letting off steam after seeing a slew of these kinds of pitch f/x articles since June. They’re so vague that I don’t end up learning anything.

I want to see results. Let’s talk whiffs, ISO, walks, all by pitch, then probably pitch sequence. It’s a hell of a lot more informative to me as a viewer to know that Pitcher X can’t throw his deuce for a strike to save his life than that it moves Y inches. And if I already know the miss/swing rate on the curve, the actual speed/movement is pretty much unimportant.

Actual speed and movement is nimportant unless you’re trying to predict future performance, but the groundwork to be able to do so isn’t in place yet. Pitch f/x is too new. John Walsh and Josh Kalk are the only two guys I’m aware of even trying to lay that foundation, and they’re amateurs who’ve only had two summers to get that in place. If you have any kind of aptitude for working with databases, please please please work on that stuff before these sorts of profiles. Or concurrently. Doesn’t have to be zero sum, I spose.

…sorry for the diatribe(s)

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 23, 2008 8:57 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Harry Pavlidis

On Beyond the Box Score also does this kind of work. In theory, Josh Kalk writes for this site, but hasn’t contributed in awhile.

Also, Mike Fast has laid the groundwork for nRuns100. Have you read his stuff on The Hardball Times?

Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting

by Kyle Boddy on Dec 23, 2008 10:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yes.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 24, 2008 10:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you make some valid points

colinjt,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree that pitch F/X has some questions left to answer, but I also feel that we can’t just dump the technology because we do not have all of the answers yet. I feel that an article like this goes a long way toward showing why a pitcher like Lester is successful- what he throws, how often, and what sort of movement his pitches have.

As for your comments on the direct effectiveness of the pitches, that is a topic that I am very interested in. I believe that a couple of people have used linear weights for offensive events to show the run value of each ball put in play. Calculating balls and strikes is more tricky, but I suppose it’s possible. This is something that I’ll look into in the future.

by David Golebiewski on Dec 24, 2008 2:29 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

tRA gives lwts values to GB/FB/LD

that’s an example…sort of.

and i’m not at all talking about dumping the technology. i’m talking about making the most of what we have. Kalk’s pfx tool makes available every metric i mentioned. see here

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 24, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

further explanation...

the “see here” link is a google doc i made in support of a number of quick and dirty scouting reports i did on the fly for south side sox before games. i c/p’d from the kalk tool.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Dec 24, 2008 10:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

for the visual that popped in my head after using the word eviscerate.

I used to hate watching Lester pitch because it’d be more about his cancer (great story the first few times!) than about his pitching. But he’s definitely become a very good big league pitcher.

I love pitch f/x cause it helps me understand a pitcher’s repertoire, especially if I don’t get to see them pitch often. You also run into guys who have absolutely electric stuff and then you realize their success is limited cause they can’t get it over the plate. Or you can see someone reinvent themselves like Lidge or Mussina. Cliff Lee’s data is pretty interesting too. 73% fastballs with good movement that go 90 MPH, eh?

by VictorW on Dec 24, 2008 7:55 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

It is planned.

Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting

by Kyle Boddy on Dec 25, 2008 7:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Driveline Mechanics!
Start posting on Driveline Mechanics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pitching Mechanics Retrospective
Small
Why the Blue Jays are a pitching mechanics train wreck.
Small
Brandon League's unusual arm action
Small
Summary: Aroldis Chapman's mechanics.
Small
The Blue Jays: A trainwreck of pitching mechanics.
Small
Re: Analysis of Justin Duchscherer's pitching mechanics.
Website_pic_small
Complete Hitting
Website_pic_small
Complete Hitting
Website_pic_small
CCC's to success in Baseball: Commitment to becoming a Complete Player = Confidence in your abilities.
Website_pic_small
The Eight Essential Pieces to a Smooth Swing

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Me_-_baseball_small Kyle Boddy

Editors

Photo_29_small hazel

Newavatar_small devil_fingers

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols