Luke Hochevar : Joakim Soria's Future Setup Man?
Luke Hochevar was picked with the first overall pick of the Kansas City Royals in the 2006 amateur draft. Since being drafted, he has pitched exceptionally well in the minors as a starter (ERA = 3.59, WHIP = 1.243, BB/SO = 3.06) and reasonably as a young stater in the majors. Looking at Luke's numbers a little further shows that he starts out the games great, but begins to really struggle after a couple of innings. Here are his lifetime major league splits showing how he does early in the game compared to later in the game (I will only use numbers prior to the 8th inning for Luke has only made it to the 8th inning as starter once).
| Split | R/PA | H/PA | HR/PA | BB/PA | SO/PA | SO/BB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BAbip | tOPS+ |
| 1st inning | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.82 | 0.220 | 0.311 | 0.319 | 0.629 | 0.235 | 64 |
| 2nd inning | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 1.5 | 0.266 | 0.344 | 0.367 | 0.711 | 0.293 | 84 |
| 3rd inning | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.303 | 0.382 | 0.523 | 0.905 | 0.301 | 132 |
| 4th inning | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 2.57 | 0.299 | 0.358 | 0.433 | 0.791 | 0.351 | 104 |
| 5th inning | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 1.38 | 0.286 | 0.344 | 0.429 | 0.773 | 0.306 | 99 |
| 6th inning | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 2.4 | 0.304 | 0.355 | 0.377 | 0.732 | 0.351 | 90 |
| 7th inning | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 1.5 | 0.355 | 0.394 | 0.677 | 1.071 | 0.346 | 172 |
| 1st PA in G | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 1.12 | 0.250 | 0.332 | 0.347 | 0.680 | 0.273 | 76 |
| 2nd PA in G | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 1.5 | 0.299 | 0.370 | 0.483 | 0.854 | 0.318 | 119 |
| 3rd+ PA in G | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 1.69 | 0.308 | 0.360 | 0.453 | 0.813 | 0.333 | 109 |
| Pitch 1-25 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.75 | 0.261 | 0.353 | 0.366 | 0.720 | 0.273 | 87 |
| Pitch 26-50 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 1.67 | 0.264 | 0.323 | 0.401 | 0.724 | 0.283 | 86 |
| Pitch 51-75 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 1.67 | 0.329 | 0.393 | 0.541 | 0.934 | 0.357 | 140 |
| Pitch 76-100 | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 1.9 | 0.282 | 0.342 | 0.359 | 0.701 | 0.333 | 82 |
| Pitch 101+ | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.286 | 0.375 | 0.571 | 0.946 | 0.250 | 142 |
Looking at the data, what stands out is how SLG increases marketable after the first 2 innings. Luke is just getting hit harder after the as the game progresses.
Then I used BrooksBaseball.net's pitch information and classification to see if there is any trends in Luke's pitching. Here are the the pitch classifications: FA = Fastball, FF = FourSeam Fastball, CH = Changeup, CL = Slider, CU = Curveball. The following is a charts of Luke's pitches for starts over the last 2 year to see if any reason behind these increasing numbers.First, here are the results of every single pitch:
As can be seen, Luke's strikes per pitch increase while balls decrease. With just those thread, his results should improve in the later innings. This advantage of increase SO/BB seems to be offset by the increase in base runners.
Second, Luke's pitch speeds begin to drop as can be seen in the following chart and graph.
| Innings | CH | SL | CU | FA | FF |
| 3rd and 4th vs 1st and 2nd | -0.88 | -0.32 | -1.53 | -0.14 | -1.25 |
| 6th and 7th vs 1st and 2nd | -2.26 | -0.73 | -3.09 | -1.16 | -1.03 |
Finally this graph shows that Luke doesn't throw his fastball as much as sliders, curves and change-ups as the game progresses.
I am wondering if he is saving himself by not throwing the fastball or he knows that it is slower and he has no confidence in it
Conclusions
Luke Hochevar is considerably better in the first 2 innings compared to the next 5 for the first 1.5 years of his career. He quickly loses speed on all his pitches and doesn't throw that fastball as much. Luke was decent in the minors as a starter, but I believe that he can not cut it as a major league starter. The Royals will probably try to use Luke as a starter for a little longer, but his place is in the pen setting up Joakim Soria unless he finds a way to have some stamina to pitch into and past the 3rd inning.
2 recs |
6 comments
Comments
maybe around the third inning
he notices how awful the infield defense behind him is, and he thinks “well i’d better stop throwing this sinker/fastball”.
by benfunke on Jun 1, 2009 1:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha
it improved though with Bloomquist and Callaspo
Big Numbers
by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did notice that he has the most success when he throws the fastball the most...
One of the rules of pitching: Establish the fastball, work off of that…
The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17
2. David Purcey TOR May 1
3. Brian Burres TOR May 1
4. Bryan Bullington TOR May 1
by 306008 on Jun 1, 2009 6:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is why he started the year in the minors
The Royals have noticed this trend too. This is actually the reason he was sent to the minors in the beginning of the year. He supposedly worked on it in the minors, but I don’t know how much he improved it.
If he builds up his stamina then its possible he’ll be a good starter. Until he does he’ll be a liability. Maybe Greinke can help since he keeps his speed throughout games.
by OsandRoyals on Jun 2, 2009 7:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hochevar would probably be better suited as a middle relief guy.
We should stick with Farnsworth until we either sign or draft a good setup man. WHen is Yabuta coming up?
Big Numbers
by homerun013 on Jun 2, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know if I agree...
I was always lead to believe that starters are more valuable than relievers, so if he is a serviceable starter, is this better than a good reliever?
What if we convert Hochevar to closer, and try Soria as a starter?
Nothing from Nothing leads to... Your 2009 Kansas City Royals
by averagegatsby on Jul 1, 2009 7:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














