Celebrating Adequacy: The 11 Average-est Position Players in Baseball at the Moment
You know the drill with baseball bloggers: we like to talk about players who are either really, really good, or (and perhaps preferably -- overall, we're pretty misanthropic) really, really bad. But what about the guys in the middle of the pack? Hey, they have value, too -- a surprising amount, given what they often go for on the free agent market.. So, with some help from my good friend the FanGraphs WAR leaderboards, let's take a look at the 11 most average position players in the majors leagues at the moment.
One the things I like about the generic concept of Wins Above Replacement (WAR) as formulated by Tom Tango
(and implemented in different ways at FanGraphs and Rally's historical WAR site) is its relative simplicity , particularly with regard to position players, is its simplicity. While the derivations of offensive runs above average, defensive value, and positional adjustments are a bit more complex, once you have the data, the basic math is basically just a bit of prorating, adding, substracting, and multiplying. And if you aren't concerned with replacement level, to figure out of a player is above or below average, once you add everything up -- offense, defense, position, and baserunning (FanGraphs has not yet implemented a baserunning statistic other than steals, which is included in their offensive linear weights), figuring out if a player is average is easy: 0 is average, so anything above zero is above average, and anything below zero is below average. Simple enough.
With that out of the way, let's get back to the celebration of adequacy. What I did was simple enough. I went the the FanGraphs position player value leaderboards (all data is as of Monday morning, June 22), sorted by runs above replacement (RAR). To get "average" out of this, I simply subtracted the "Replacement" runs from the RAR total. This gives value runs above/below average.
Finding the "average-est" player was simple -- find the player whose RAR-Replacement number was closest to zero. Then I simply took the five players above and below him for a total of 11 players. So, yeah, it isn't terribly precise, but it serves my purpose of getting a group of players together to see some of the different "flabors of league average" (didn't someone use this phrase recently in the sabermetric blogosphere?).
So here are the 11 "Most Average" position players in the MLB according to FanGraphs, from "bottom" to "top." Remeber, these players are ranked by absolute distance from average, not by overall value (although that is listed as well).
11) Adam Dunn, Washington Nationals.
RAR: 8.9
Replacement: 9.9
1.0 Runs Below Average
I've written about Dunn recently, so I don't want to belabor the point. He's been an offensive monster so far this season (+15.7 runs above average), but his defense has simply been atrocious (-13.1) in left field and first base (-3.6 positional adjustment). He's one of the few players whose value would almost certainly be greater as a DH -- heck, he'd probably be above average there. The sabermetric lovefest for Dunn is pretty much over -- don't worry about the strikeouts, just catch the ball, Adam!
10) TIE Randy Winn, San Francisco Giants
RAR: 9.8
Replacement: 9.2
0.6 Runs Above Average
Even among underrated players, Winn is underrated. It's probably a combination of being a corner outfielder without being a power bat and being on mostly bad teams during his career. In addition, he's pretty old... but despite being above average, this actually is a down year for Winn (prorated for 600 PAs, he's almost exactly league average) due to a bad bat despite his typically good defense. Other than a down 1.4 year in 2006, he's been consistently above average for years, averaging about 3.5 WAR a season from 2002-2008. Randy Winn has never made $10M in a season...
10) TIE Alexei Ramirez, Chicago White Sox
RAR: 9.6
Replacement: 9.0
0.6 Runs Above Average
This is a bit of a surprise, particularly given how badly Ramirez's bat has tailed off this season so far. Despite having a pretty bad year defensively at 2B in 2008 (-8.3 UZR), the White Sox moved Ramirez to SS in 2009. So far (albeit in a small sample size for defensive stats) he is +2.7 runs at the hardest defensive position on the field. Once again, the White Sox defy sabermetric conventional wisdom and win.
8) TIE, Kendry Morales, Los Angeles Angels
RAR: 8.1
Replacement: 8.6
0.6 Runs Below Average
No, he isn't Mark Teixeira, but despite the Angels' seemingly-typical efforts to not play their young, cost-controlled players, they didn't have a choice this season. Morales hasn't been a superstar, but he's been capable on both sides of the ball.
8) TIE, David DeJesus, Kansas City Royals
RAR: 9.5
Replacement: 9.0
0.5 Runs Above Average
Yay! More Royals content! Seriously, I'm a DDJ fan, but this surprised me a bit a few weeks ago. Yes, I assumed he'd be a good defender in LF, but he has been pretty dreadful with the bat (.306 wOBA). Still,8.7 runs above average, even in LF, is very valuable. DDJ's offense, like the Royals in general, has disappointed even my relatively low expectations (as opposed to all the uninformed "next Rays!" hype out there before the season started), but his defense has more than made up for it. No, at the moment he isn't on pace for his usual ~3 WAR season, but his bat is starting to heat up a bit, so it's not out of the realm of possibility. He's above average now, anyway. He's sort of an American League version of Randy Winn -- a singles-hitting outfielder who is a good defender in the corner, but not quite good enough any more to play CF regularly. They do a lot of things well, nothing great. Without looking at FanGraphs, how many people would have guessed that DeJesus and Winn have each been more valuable than Adam Dunn this season?
6) J.J. Hardy, Milwaukee Brewers
RAR: 9.0
Replacement: 8.8
0.4 Runs Above Average
Are you seeing a trend here? Another guy whose numbers with the bat (.283 wOBA) would make you think he would be utterly useless so far this season. But he's actually been above average by being a defensive monster at the most difficult defensive position on the diamond (catcher is its own thing). Playing time is the only thing keeping him from being more valuable overall than
5) TIE Rafael Furcal, Los Angeles Dodgers
RAR: 9.5
Replacement: 9.0
0.2 Runs Above Average
Well, at least he's been healthy. Yes, he's been above average despite being almost as bad with the bat (.295 wOBA) as Hardy, but this isn't what the Dodgers were hoping for when they gave him the big contract in the offseason. Still, his fielding has been very good. Note to GMs: Shortstops who can field are valuable. Still, while average players are valuable, and the season isn't half-over, this doesn't bode well for the future of Furcal's contract. Who would have thought Ned Colletti would overpay for an aging, overrated veteran?
5) TIE, Bengie Molina, San Francisco Giants
RAR: 8.1
Replacement: 8.3
0.2 Runs Below Average
I thought about excluding all catchers, since FanGraphs doesn't have a running catcher defense stat at this time (I'll be posting on a provisional one soon), but hey, it's another Giant! As you might expect, the positional adjustment for Molina is the highest of all the players encountered here.
5) Carlos Lee, Houston Astros
RAR: 9.0
Replacement: 9.2
0.2 Runs Below Average
Sure, he's almost average. And he does have 43 RBI.... (ahem) Still, 18.5 million dollars isn't what it used to be.
2) Jhonny Peralta, Cleveland Indians
RAR: 9.0
Replacement: 9.2
0.1 Runs Below Average
Jhonny isn't hitting that well this season, and he's been playing more 3B this season than in the past, but believe it or not, UZR says he's been better at SS (+2.4) than 3B (-1.6) so far this season. That seems unlikely to persist given a larger sample. It will be interesting to see how the year rounds out for this perienally-bouncing-between-over-and-underrated player.
So here we are... the most average-est position player in the major leagues as of this writing....
1) Paul Konerko, Chicago White Sox
RAR: 9.0
Replacement: 9.0
EXACTLY Average
Tremendous work by Paul. He isn't exactly tearing the cover off of the ball, but he hasn't been terrible (.342 wOBA in a hitters' park). Decent fielding so far at 1B (+3.7) although at this pace it would be a career year. Still... to average right on the mark... that isn't easy my friends. Sure, at this rate, the contract is a bit to big ($12M this season), but hey, at least he isn't Carlos Lee!
So there is is my friends... the most average position player in the majors at the moment... join us at some random time in the future when we again venture into the realm of pure adequacy.
Appendix: Here is a quick table of the players discussed above with the FanGraphs data used as of today. "Avg" is their current runs above/below average (RAR-Replace). Remember that the players are sorted above by their "absolute" distance from average (0.0), which is how this ranking is sorted.
| Rnk | Name | Bat | Field | Replace | Pos. | RAR | Avg |
| 1 | P. Konerko | 1.6 | 3.7 | 9.0 | -5.3 | 9.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | J. Peralta | -3.0 | 0.8 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 8.7 | -0.1 |
| 5 | C. Lee | 8.2 | -5.0 | 9.2 | -3.5 | 9.0 | -0.2 |
| 5 | B. Molina | -5.0 | n/a | 8.3 | 4.7 | 8.1 | -0.2 |
| 5 | R. Furcal | -7.0 | 4.3 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 9.3 | 0.2 |
| 6 | J. J. Hardy | -9.8 | 7.4 | 8.6 | 2.8 | 9.0 | 0.4 |
| 8 | D. DeJesus | -5.2 | 8.7 | 9.0 | -3.0 | 9.5 | 0.5 |
| 8 | K. Morales | 3.2 | 1.2 | 8.6 | -4.9 | 8.1 | -0.5 |
| 10 | A. Ramirez | -5.1 | 2.7 | 9.0 | 3.1 | 9.6 | 0.6 |
| 10 | R. Winn | -3.4 | 6.7 | 9.2 | -2.7 | 9.8 | 0.6 |
| 11 | A. Dunn | 15.7 | -13.1 | 9.9 | -3.6 | 8.9 | -1.0 |
3 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
The list a sham/disgrace without any Willy Bloomquist
You better redo your numbers.
Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.
by Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal) on Jun 23, 2009 9:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the problem
the Royals are so stupid that he hasn’t played enough to qualify yet!
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot, the Royals suck at sucking
Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.
by Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal) on Jun 23, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you should try rooting for the Indians
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Jun 23, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, much worse
It’s not like the Indians actually made the playoffs since 1985. Oh, wait.
The Indians have made the playoffs 7 times since 1995, while the Royals have 7 playoff appearances from 1976-1985.
by AxDxMx on Jun 23, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
3rd order w-l records, Al Central
Twins: 38.2-32.8
Tigers: 34.4-34.6
Indians: 35.3-35.7
Royals: 31.7-36.3
White Sox: 31.7-37.3
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Easy everyone
It’s tongue in cheek. I’m beating d_f to the punch, is all.
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Jun 23, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm trying to give more "general" content
and this still turns into an AL Central Pity KCA/CLE party
can we at least make fun of Adam Dunn or Carlos Lee a bit? ANyone else a bit surprised J. J. Hardy and Alexei are this close to average?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indians are a mess
I actually feel like the Royals have more hope and that is sad.
Baseball is God's sport! All Truth Goes Through Three Stages 1.It is ridiculed 2.It is violently opposed 3.Finally, it is accepted as self-evident. kinesiologist
by E5 on Jun 23, 2009 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those are some big names on that list.
Better keep this from the media.
OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 23, 2009 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
but adam dunn is a veteran leader now!
seriously, though, I just foun dit interesting how many guys are thought to be having terrible years but are actually around average (Ramirez, DeJesus, Hardy, etc.). But whatever.. it’s all interesting.
Somehow, Konerko being exactly average (as of yesterday) seems perfect4 to me.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe a good player's terrible year is the same as a replacement player's average year?
If that made sense. At all.
OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 23, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you have made my head hurt
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not good.
60% of 100% relative ability = 100% of 60% relative ability.
That makes more sense, if you weren’t joking.
OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 23, 2009 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that really how you should calculate average?
Correct me if I’m wrong. RAR is (Runs created by particular player) – (Runs that would have been created by a “Replacement level” Player playing the same position). So RAR – Replacement is just (Runs created by pp) – 2*(Replacement Runs). That would make Average = 2* Replacement. But I don’t think that’s necessarily true. Maybe it is but it doesn’t seem obvious to me.
In fact, the average RAR score for major league players is about 12. Making that closer to what I’d expect average to be. If that’s the case, DeRosa, Damon and Beltre are “Average” and these people are 3 or so runs below average.
by metric on Jun 23, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's how RAR/WAR works at Fangraphs, as I understand it
Batting and Fielding Runs are above or below what a league average player in the current season would produce in the same playing time. Batting runs are park-adjusted wRAA, Fielding runs are UZR.
The generic formula is this, then (as Dave Cameron put it in his series and Dave Appleman has clarified to me)
Batting Runs + Fielding Runs + Positional Adjustment (Prorated per 162 games) + Replacement (Prorated at +20 runs per 600 PA).
So Replacement runs are simply added on — I’m not adjusting for relative playing time, which is what replacement runs represent. Everything else is relative to average.
Sure, it’s a crude measure used here for fun, but it does also show how if people aren’t comfortable with the concept of “replacement level” for whatever reason, they can see if a player is “good” or “bad” relative to average.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 23, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love posts like this. Toys.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Jun 23, 2009 6:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd for the pitcure
St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/
by vivaelpujols on Jun 25, 2009 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
don't be mad just because Skip didn't make it on!
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jun 25, 2009 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs













