Pitching Mechanics: Derek Holland
I've gotten quite a few requests to look at the pitching mechanics of Derek Holland, and a longtime reader named Kevin W. sent me an email with clips of Holland striking out a batter with his 95 mph fastball. Since I've long said that anyone who sends me GIF images of pitchers from a decent angle will likely have their request granted, I think it's only fair to follow up on that promise!
Here's what Kevin himself had to say about Holland:
"Derek Holland, 22 year old power lefty of Texas Rangers. Drafted in the 25th round in 2007, he rocketed through the Rangers farm system. 6'2", 185 lbs, mid 90s fastball. He can hit 97 mph, usually sits between 92-95 mph.
In his 12th career MLB start, he shut out the Anaheim Angels, posting this line:
9 IP, 3 H, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K. 96 pitches, 73 strikes. He also took a no hitter until the 6th inning in that game.
I have attached a gif of him getting a strikeout on a 95 mph fastball during that shutout."
I think that just about covers it. So far, Derek Holland has posted the following line in the majors:
FIP has Holland pegged at 4.62 while tRA (now available on Fangraphs; this is awesome) has him at 5.31 with a 18% LD rate, 43.6% GB rate, and 38.4% FB rate. Pretty solid for a first-year starter - the home runs are a bit of a problem, but he's never had a major problem with it in the minors and should settle down after some time in the big leagues.
Look behind the cut for the great animated GIF that Kevin sent in along with a quick blurb about his pitching mechanics!

Trip Somers (of TexasLeaguers.com) had this to say about Derek Holland:
...you can surely see some similarities to Tim Lincecum. They share a similar stride and an intense trunk flexion. Each launches himself forward with such force that he flies through the air dragging his back foot like an anchor before landing firmly on the front leg.
At this point, both pitchers have their trunks extended (bent backwards). As the hips turn forward, the trunk flexes and drives the throwing shoulder almost directly over the front hip.
Where they really differ is in their arm actions. Holland picks the ball up early; the ball is at driveline height before his front foot lands. Lincecum picks the ball up fairly late; the ball is still near his hip until right before his front foot lands. Holland picks the ball up with his shoulder. Lincecum picks the ball up with his elbow and has to forcefully externally rotate his arm to position it for the throw.
Holland takes the ball further toward third base than Lincecum takes the ball toward first base. When Holland starts to drive his pitching shoulder, his arm and the ball are accelerated toward first base before they are accelerated toward the plate. This large lateral acceleration results in forearm flyout that is not present in Lincecum's delivery.
Holland releases the ball with a low 3/4 arm angle and has a very clean follow-through with no noticeable recoil.
As usual, we agree. I'll throw in my two cents to compare the two.
- Tempo: Holland is much slower to footplant from maximal leg lift than Lincecum, clocking in at 23 frames per second. Ideally this number will be at or under 20 frames per second - building momentum towards the plate helps to provide an energy source to convert linear forces into rotational forces and help to increase fastball velocity and take strain off the upper body.
- Arm Action: Holland is better at getting the ball up in the driveline early, but because of his closed landing stance, he has to pull his pitching arm across his body and flex his torso significantly to achieve his release point. This will unnecessarily stress the pectoralis minor and the anterior portion of his shoulder. Holland would benefit from striding slightly more open to take strain off of his torso and to achieve a higher arm slot to eliminate much of his forearm flyout and unnecessary side-to-side movement of the pitching arm.
- Ball Release: As I pointed out above, Holland exhibits significant forearm flyout as a result of striding too closed and will have difficulty pronating through release on all of his pitches. This is evident when looking at high speed footage of Holland throwing off a mound.
- Followthrough: Holland has a mostly clean followthrough, but without pronating through release, he's going to have compressive forces on the back of the elbow that slam the olecranon process into its fossa.
I wouldn't be surprised if he skips a start or two due to a fatigued shoulder or inflammation in the pitching elbow as the Rangers are likely to treat him with kid gloves down the stretch.
0 recs |
25 comments
|
Comments
So should my fantasy team keep him for next year or not?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by devil_fingers on Aug 18, 2009 7:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Isn't he long-arming a bit?
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Aug 18, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
But is that a bad thing?
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Aug 21, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thought that was bad for the old shoulder capsule ala Freddy Garcia.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Aug 23, 2009 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freddy Garcia
Has problems with hyperabduction, not long-arming.
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Aug 25, 2009 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Holland isn't hyperabducting at all?
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Aug 26, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't look like it.
At least from this view.
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Aug 27, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me...
His arm angle/shoulder-tilt looks more vertical in the recent clip (high 3/4). My personal recollection from seeing him several times in Frisco last season was that he had a fairly vertical release. I was shocked to see the low angle at Spring Training.
Honestly, I haven’t paid too much attention to his release this year.
by NoNameOnCard on Aug 18, 2009 10:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
rich harden
i cant help it, he kind of looks like a lefty rich harden to me
by loeres on Aug 20, 2009 12:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, you're right.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Aug 21, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a bad comparison.
Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting
by Kyle Boddy on Aug 21, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't Rich Harden have bad mechanics?
Or does he just get injured due to other factors.
Thanks
by vivaelpujols on Aug 21, 2009 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The 2009 Texas Rangers offense: sigh...
by Kinslerhomer on Aug 22, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
from what we know
Holland is an extremely hard worker and according to CJ Wilson he is the best conditioned/in shape dude on the staff. Not sure how much that counts towards staying healthy, but it probably helps.
"The House That Ruth Built, 85 years old, goes out as The House That Hamilton Knocked Down"
by blalock84 on Aug 24, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably an odd place to ask this, but is the FanGraphs tRA statistic better than the StatCorner tRA statistic?
http://twitter.com/FlyByKnite
by FlyByKnight on Aug 23, 2009 5:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
no
I believe it just uses different data. Correct me if I’m wrong, anyone, but Stat Corner uses batted ball data from MLB Gameday, and FanGraphs uses data from Baseball Info Solutions.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by devil_fingers on Aug 23, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I remember hearing about that stuff but doesn’t the FanGraphs tRA adjust for something else too? Can’t remember. Maybe I’m wrong.
And which tRA statistic, between the two, would be the more accurate one to use?
http://twitter.com/FlyByKnite
by FlyByKnight on Aug 23, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BIZ is probably more accurate than Gameday
Although I’m not sure if FanGraphs’ is park adjusted, I know tRA’s is.
Thanks
by vivaelpujols on Aug 24, 2009 4:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That should read, I know *statcorner's* is
Thanks
by vivaelpujols on Aug 24, 2009 4:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm. So I should use StatCorner’s version then?
http://twitter.com/FlyByKnite
by FlyByKnight on Aug 24, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
FanGraphs is also park adjusted
But there adjustments aren’t component based, which is better. However, BIS is probably better than Gameday.
I would just average the two out.
Thanks
by vivaelpujols on Aug 24, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would just average the two out.
Alright. Doesn’t sound too bad. Just add them and divide by two. Sounds good. Thanks.
http://twitter.com/FlyByKnite
by FlyByKnight on Aug 24, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Adjusted
tRA on FanGraphs is park adjusted, though it does not use component park factors. I’ll start using component park factors in the off-season probably.
by dkappelman on Aug 24, 2009 6:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cool
I think that would be useful for tRA, to take out some of the park related bias’ in batted ball classifications.
Thanks
by vivaelpujols on Aug 24, 2009 6:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















